Letter to the Editor
To The sentinel:
This letter is in response to an article in the Regional section
of the Sentinel,
"Briefs".
The article, headlined, "Waivers Granted For Housing Plan"
stated:
may be approaching
several new waivers by The
Outrageous!
Every taxpayer in Winchester should be up in arms over this
decision by the Planning Board and especially chairperson
Margaret Sharra,
unit condo project, which
vote at the Sept 19th meeting.
Mr Jack Marsh had convinced the board to deny this application
based on
issues had been left
Now,suddenly the board has done a complete turnaround and has
granted three of four waivers submitted to the town board by
Mr Vandyke's attorney
to develop this project.
This includes granting a waiver to allow Mr Vandyke relief from having
to submit a
on any building project,under the premise this
hardship by having to spend the money required to submit completed
design changes.
The Planning Board also granted Mr. Van Dyke a special waiver to
intrude upon the required 100 foot
meant to protect abutters and wetlands, to
ponds and culverts; which will channel runoff from the
adjacent neighbors' properties.
They are also allowing him to
125 feet over the zoning ordinance requirement of 400' simply because
his lot layout doesn't meet the criteria,not
obstacles. As stated in the article, this proposed project just doesn't
fit the terrain.
No mention of the impact of leaching upwards of 20,000 gallons of
live sewage
whose responsibility
and septic systems fail.
Nor did they have concerns what impact the approval of this project
will do to our over
property taxes.
As a member of the budget committee, I know firsthand how fragile
the school budget is. What's the impact going to be once these 32,
two- to- three bedroom units are occupied by school children?
Many of our
currently pay the fourth-highest rate in the state.
Why have they granted all of these exemptions of the zoning
ordinance rules for
Is Margaret Sharra, working for the towns
actually pandering to this applicant?
15th, Planning Board meeting, working in the best interest of the
town when she introduced the
out documents she researched, to planning board members
indicating other towns being sued, casting out fear that the board
acted too hastily?
I feel that there is more going on here than meets the eye and that
there are other
board's decisions.
When I
when there was a special interest in the outcome of their vote, I was
verbally attacked by certain members of the board for
concerns.
Have some of our board members broken their oaths; to protect
rights, health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Winchester and to
enforce
by showing their
present at
( call the town hall for time )
Call or write the selectman and planning board members.
893 Old Westmport Road
Winchester
5 comments:
In all fairness, a response to Mr. Davis' letter, by planning board member, Larry Hill, was published in the Keene Sentinel letters to the Editor section in February. I am attempting to find a copy and post here for all to see.
Keene Sentinel Saturday February 9, 2008
Letter was unfair to us
To the Sentinel:
Freedom of speech does not include slander.
This letter is in response to the contribution by Bob Davis to the reader opinion section of January 27, in which he voiced a number of allegations regarding the Winchester Planning Board.
As members of the planning board our response is as follows:
1) It appears Mr. Davis is unaware of the legal duties of the planning board.
2) It appears that Mr. Davis is unaware of the research and council sought by the planning board.
3) It is obvious Mr. Davis has unjustifiably attacked the character and integrity of the board members without research, knowledge or justification.
4) Why hasn't Mr. Davis, or anyone else who has concerns, run for a position on the planning board? Is it because it is a volunteer position with no compensation?
5) While we would never promote litigation among neighbors, Mr. Davis should be aware that a court may consider unfounded allegations slanderous.
6) Mr. Davis: We would welcome an apology.
Larry Hill
Planning Board member
South Parrish Road
Winchester
and
Ken Cole
Planning Board member
Keene Road
Winchester
I see things have not changed despite us attempting to get rid of the cancer that infected the town several years ago. As someone who was involved somewhat in town government in another town before I moved here. I see the same old problems rearing their ugly head here again. I commend you people in your efforts to fight and stand up for what is right and just. I have sent you an email in regards to donating to your cause and to providing you some information that may help in the coming months. I truly hope others in town will follow your lead and stand up to the core of people who are ruining this town for the decent folks who live here.
In regards to this parcel of land, has the town compensated the Penacook Nation for its land? We, the Natives, are watching and waiting to see what you will do. You actions resemble those of a child who is greedy and selfish. It is rather cumbersome to see that someone has no regard for their neighbors' health and concerns. I believe that we need to address more pressing issues such as refunding the money
($250,000) to the Trust fund that you deliberately took out to compensate for your inability to manage the general fund within its boundaries. That money is to be returned to the Trust so that we can have a new sewage system without raising taxes. I am certain that others will agree with that concept. Wouldn't you want that done if someone was managing your retirement money and you were an invalid? That is how we feel when you deliberately make changes in spite of our votes that insist that it not be approved. Your actions prove that our votes do not count, thus you are destroying yourselves.
To the person who just posted would you please explain exactly what it is you are talking about? Does the Penacook tribe own this land and did the town purchase it or set up a trust fund? I'm not following your post.
Post a Comment