Too bad certain elected officials here don't have one.
Dummerston Selectboard chairman to resign; cites conflict of interest
By MIKE FAHER / Reformer Staff
Friday February 8, 2013 DUMMERSTON -- The
chairman of Dummerston's Selectboard says he will resign following a
dispute at a Wednesday meeting over his ties to the town's highway
Lewis White, a five-year veteran of the Selectboard, maintained
that he never has shown any favoritism to the department, which is led
by his cousin, Lee Chamberlin.
Several other town officials agreed, and they urged White to
reconsider his decision. But White on Thursday said he won't risk the
town dealing with allegations of impropriety every time a road-related
"This will be thrown in my face," White said. "We're not going to have that. I'm not going to deal with that."
White said he will submit a letter of resignation within days. He
also said he does not expect to accept a Selectboard position if he is
re-elected at the upcoming Town Meeting -- though he did not completely
rule out that possibility.
The highway-department issue came to a head during a
sometimes-heated Selectboard meeting Wednesday at the community center
in West Dummerston.
But the dispute has roots in a long-running disagreement over a September decision of the town's Development Review Board.
The review board denied a site-plan approval and variances
requested by Schoolhouse Road residents John and Lori Thibault for a
fence standing more than 6 feet high, a deck, and an above-ground pool.
The Thibaults have appealed the board's decision in Vermont Environmental
Court. And there has been ongoing debate about whether and how the town
should be represented in those proceedings.
It's become clear that some Selectboard members thought the review
board's decision was unfair. In one example, Selectman Tom Bodett said
during a Nov. 28 meeting that he felt the ruling was "overly
"I thought it overstepped ... I didn't feel I could defend it," Bodett said at the time.
In an interview Thursday, Bodett said he since has gained a better understanding of the board's decision.
"But I still think the perception of that case is doing great
damage to the overall perception of our planning and zoning process,"
The criticism led Herb Rest, the review board's chairman, to read
a pointed letter into the record at Wednesday's Selectboard meeting.
Rest said his friendship with a neighbor of the Thibaults had no bearing
on the board's review, pointing out that the neighbor appeared at an
Aug. 15 hearing but did not testify.
"I failed to conclude that I should have recused myself in this matter," Rest wrote.
Rest added that now that the neighbor in question has filed to
appear in the Thibault court appeal, he has withdrawn "my candidacy as a
town-appointed resource to the court in this matter" to avoid any
appearance of a conflict.
He also said continued criticisms from some Selectboard members
are "undermining the functionality of the DRB process," and he objected
to any allegations of impropriety.
"I reviewed all of the DRB decisions rendered in the last
approximately 18 months. I will state categorically that there is no
bias suggested and that the decisions consistently reflect the will of
the citizens of Dummerston as expressed in their zoning bylaws," Rest
"I, quite frankly, am bewildered by any contrary conclusion of the Selectboard if they too researched their allegations."
That led resident Jody Normandeau to angrily denounce the
Selectboard, saying Rest and review board member Lew Sorenson had been
"I have never seen such abuse of another public body," Normandeau said.
She also pointed out the familial relationship between White and
Chamberlin. For White to raise a conflict-of-interest question,
Normandeau said, "is like a pot calling the kettle black."
White noted that he had recused himself from any involvement in
Chamberlin's hiring. But also said he would leave the Selectboard if
residents perceive a conflict of interest.
"If it's seen that way, it's seen that way," White said, adding, "this will be my last meeting."
Later in the meeting, other Selectboard members, Town Clerk
Pamela McFadden and meeting attendees -- including Normandeau -- asked
White to remain on the board.
"This is an inexperienced board," Selectboard member Steve Glabach said. "We need your experience."
But White said much of the town's business is highway-related,
and he said he didn't want his vote to be a deciding vote on such
"That shouldn't happen," he said. "So, it won't happen."
For the resignation to be effective, White will have to submit a
letter. The Selectboard then would appoint someone to fill that position
until Town Meeting, McFadden said Thursday.
White's departure also would complicate the upcoming election.
While there are two candidates for a three-year term, White is the only
listed candidate for a two-year term on the board and it is too late for
his name to be removed.
If he is elected but does not want the position, White would have to resign again.
On Thursday, White said he likely will search for someone else to seek the office.
"I would like to find somebody who wants to run as a write-in and support him," he said.
Bodett, who also is leaving the board as his term expires, said
he hopes White reconsiders. He echoed others in saying he never has seen
evidence of bias.
On highway-department matters, "if anything, I have seen (White) exercise more caution than the rest us," Bodett said.
Bodett, who was out of town and absent from Wednesday's meeting,
said he regrets any role he played in escalating the dispute with the
DRB. And he called for a careful re-examination of what truly
constitutes a conflict of interest.
"I would like to see everybody take a breather," he said. "Is this really serving the town? No."
Please feel free to leave your comments or questions. We ask that you post responsibly, the use of foul language and any personal attacks will not be tolerated. If you have a town matter you'd like to discuss drop us an email and we will post the subject and open it for discussion for you.
This web site has no affiliation, in any official or unofficial capacity, with the Town of Winchester. Meeting times listed are for information only and do not constitute legal meeting notices. Comments are the opinions of the person(s) posting and not necessarily those of the WinchesterInformer. We reserve the right to edit or remove offensive comments.
I am part of a group of Winchester citizens completely opposed to dirty and hazardous businesses, like asphalt and wood burning plants wanting to come into town at the expense of our quality of life. I am concerned about preserving the rural character of Winchester. These types of development have no benefits for Winchester citizens and they create many health hazards and will cause the destruction of green space. Our Winchester is known for its precious natural resources; dramatic rocky slopes, unique wetlands and abundant wildlife. I feel there are many questions concerning these proposed projects that outweigh any benefits. The increase in traffic along existing streets and noise and air pollution would be very significant. I am also concerned that the town infrastructure cannot cope with the problems these types of businesses will demand. Furthermore, I am very discouraged with the Planning Board and Zoning Boards and feel they have been negligent in their duties to protect neighboring residents from health hazards and safety issues that will surely arise and affect the lives and livelihoods of many citizens.