"On July 15, 2009, the Attorney General’s Office updated its Memorandum on New Hampshire’s Right-to-Know law, RSA Chapter 91-A. This Memorandum describes the law and the judicial decisions that further define and explain the peoples’ right to know.
The purpose of this Memorandum is to provide guidance in complying with Revised Statutes Annotated (“RSA”) chapter 91-A to State and local officials, the public and the media. While enforcement of the Right-to-Know law is assigned to the superior court, the Attorney General’s Office will continue to promote the public’s understanding of the Right-to-Know law and compliance by public officials with the Right-to-Know law.
In 2008 and 2009, the New Hampshire Legislature amended the Right-to-Know law to clarify how it applies to governmental records in electronic form, electronic communications used to transact governmental business, and the duty to preserve electronic records. The amendments provide new definitions and set forth how the Right-to-Know law applies to public bodies versus public agencies. This Office has updated our Right-to-Know law Memorandum to reflect these amendments to the law and recent court decisions.
In an effort to enhance the usefulness of this Memorandum, the appendix now includes sample motions for use by public bodies when the members want to go into nonpublic session, seal non-public minutes, or adjourn to consult with legal counsel. It also includes a sample index for use when a person has requested documents that are exempt from disclosure or contain confidential information. The index can be used to inform the requestor of which documents have been withheld and the reason for their nondisclosure.
For those interested in municipal government records, the statute that establishes the retention period for municipal records is provided. Finally, the appendix includes a list of statutes, rules, and court cases that designate certain information as confidential or privileged."
The document is 127 pages long - so we suggest you look through it for any questions you might have -
http://doj.nh.gov/publications/documents/right_to_know.pdf
The two items below are subject matters that have been asked recently regarding the public's right-to-know.
2. Basic Meeting Requirements
a. No meeting shall be conducted by electronic mail or any other form of communication that does not permit the public to hear, read, or otherwise discern the meeting discussion contemporaneously at the meeting location specified in the meeting notice. RSA 91-A:2, III(c).
c. Any person shall be permitted to use recording devices including, but not limited to, tape recorders, cameras, and videotape equipment at such meetings. RSA 91-A:2, II;
Monday, January 17, 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
Meeting minutes - if we wanted to see the minutes (since they are never posted on the website) of the Trustees of the Library funds, we would have to take them to the Board themselves (if and when they had a meeting)? Or can we simply request them with the BOS office, as usual?
Good question, just who is in charge in Winchester now a days? Bob Gray always took the time to be cordial and professional and was always willing to go out of his way when dealing with the public, a truly great asset to our town and sorely missed. This new Town Administrator is just the opposite, she doesn't want anything to do with the public nor does she care about any problems you may have. She's a complete pass the buck, high and mighty pris that is over paid and self serving, just like others in the building. She is nothing even close to a Bob Gray, just what the hell do we need another employee who doesn't do her job on the town payroll. I guess your guess as is good as mine as to who you bring questions and complaints to as the BOS never listened before.
Perhaps you could bring your comments to the BOS directly or if you do not get any satifaction contact the blog or the sentinel. Then, of course if you get no where like Mr. Towne and company you can file a law suit or contact the AG's office. If enough of us do that then the AG will get the message that the damn town is corrupt!
I must say that you have to understand that the BOS would hire someone who played the game the way that they do.Bob Gray was one in a million.On that note, please keep detailed notes about rudeness and incompetence. We do need to know about that. With a little bit of luck we may be able to vote the varmits out!
To the residents of Winchester that follow the blog it's time to step up and get rid of the mess. Yes, Gus Ruth and Margaret Sharra I am still waiting for you to resign. You have cost us too damn much money. Just suck it up and save the taxpayers money.
Have a nice night blog!
Post a Comment