WINCHESTER — State-mandated cuts to the town’s 2012 spending has selectmen blaming the budget committee and taking legal action.
The N.H. Department of Revenue
Administration this month invalidated $418,956 of the spending voters
approved at March’s town meeting in the wake of a disagreement between
the two town boards over water and sewer funding.
That funding was initially not recommended by the budget committee.
But the state agency says when the money ended up getting approved by voters in March, it exceeded the state-allowed spending limit for official-ballot towns — 10 percent over the budget committee’s original recommendation.
Though the budget committee changed its recommendation to include the $537,802 funding by Election Day, the state holds to an original recommendation when determining spending limits.
The state agency informed the town in a letter dated May 1 that voters appropriated nearly $419,000 more than state law allowed based on the budget committee’s original $3.1 million spending recommendation.
Then-Chairman Brian D. Moser said Thursday the committee chose to leave out the water and sewer operations, which are funded by user fees, as a form of protest against them being listed as separate warrant articles instead of within the operating budget.
Moser said the committee had requested the departments put some of their user fees in an emergency fund. When they said no, the committee cut their budgets, Moser said.
Moser said this prompted selectmen to pull out the funding as separate articles on the warrant where the budget committee would have less control. Selectmen also recommended a combined $47,822 more than the committee had allotted for the departments.
Town Administrator Joan Morel, however, said selectmen separated the departments’ funding from the operating budget because they are self-sufficient departments and do not need to draw on general-fund money.
After the deliberative session in February, Moser said, committee members were worried about talk that they had done something illegal and voted to change their recommendation.
By then it was too late, as the Department of Revenue Administration used the original recommendation to calculate the town’s appropriation limit.
Therefore, selectmen say, the the spending limit should be raised to $4 million — which would allow for what voters approved in March.
Selectman and attorney Barton L. Mayer could not be reached for comment.
The budget committee must file a written appearance to the court by June 5.
But the state agency says when the money ended up getting approved by voters in March, it exceeded the state-allowed spending limit for official-ballot towns — 10 percent over the budget committee’s original recommendation.
Though the budget committee changed its recommendation to include the $537,802 funding by Election Day, the state holds to an original recommendation when determining spending limits.
Selectmen have now petitioned Cheshire County
Superior Court to permit the spending, saying the budget committee
failed to provide appropriate funding for water and sewer operations.
If the spending does get cut, that means more than
$170,000 would be chopped from the town’s operating budget, along with
money for the ELMM Community Center, Conant Library, road and bridge
construction and a number of other items.The state agency informed the town in a letter dated May 1 that voters appropriated nearly $419,000 more than state law allowed based on the budget committee’s original $3.1 million spending recommendation.
Then-Chairman Brian D. Moser said Thursday the committee chose to leave out the water and sewer operations, which are funded by user fees, as a form of protest against them being listed as separate warrant articles instead of within the operating budget.
Moser said the committee had requested the departments put some of their user fees in an emergency fund. When they said no, the committee cut their budgets, Moser said.
Moser said this prompted selectmen to pull out the funding as separate articles on the warrant where the budget committee would have less control. Selectmen also recommended a combined $47,822 more than the committee had allotted for the departments.
Town Administrator Joan Morel, however, said selectmen separated the departments’ funding from the operating budget because they are self-sufficient departments and do not need to draw on general-fund money.
After the deliberative session in February, Moser said, committee members were worried about talk that they had done something illegal and voted to change their recommendation.
By then it was too late, as the Department of Revenue Administration used the original recommendation to calculate the town’s appropriation limit.
Because the town protested to the state agency that
the water and sewer systems are vital, they are not being cut to get
down to the 10 percent limit. However, every other warrant article
involving money is being cut.
Items cut by the state include:
- $173,505 from the town’s operating budget.
- $56,000 for the police youth aid officer.
- $50,000 to create a Conant Library repair and maintenance fund.
- $28,450 for property assessment.
- $20,000 for road and bridge reconstruction.
- $5,000 for emergency services and relief.
- $4,000 for the annual Pickle Festival.
- $3,000 to treat exotic, invasive plants in Forest Lake.
- $1,000 for future town computer upgrades.
- $28,000 for the Evergreen Cemetery care fund.
- $50,000 to the ELMM Community Center.
Therefore, selectmen say, the the spending limit should be raised to $4 million — which would allow for what voters approved in March.
Selectman and attorney Barton L. Mayer could not be reached for comment.
The budget committee must file a written appearance to the court by June 5.
2 comments:
It will be interesting to see how the out come will be in this selectmen's power grab. On one hand you have flip-flop Rich Horton with the little-man syndrome and the other hand you have the intimidator Brian Moser
What we have here is the fact the selectmen want total control, to disallow the town people’s voice in the town government process. These power grabbing SOB’s we have elected to run this town are not going to be told to cut salaries, layoffs , curtail projects, capital improvements or delaying buying equipment by the people (the budget committee) the voters elected to control the spending in this town . All the budget committee wanted was to save home owner their rights and enjoyment of their property.
The selectmen have shown how they can be so arrogant and contempt as to corrupt by stacking town committees and the election process with the people’s selection that will help them achieve their goals under the primmest it is the people's choice or is it disavowing the people voice. When the selectmen and their surrogates squash any attempt to appose them.
The fact the selectmen would stoop so low by corrupting pass election to achieve their goals it seems nothing will stand in their way to achieve this goal of controling the spending totally. It seems to me the voters choice means nothing to these selectmen and they will prove it in court. You voters think you elect people but you really have no choice.
This suit filed will cost the tax payers a chunk of change and it will dwaft Sharra's cost to the town while looking like chump change. We the tax payers will be suing ourselves and the budget committee being an entity of the town will have to be defended by the town.
This attorney the budget committee the tax town payers will have foot the bill on. We will pay the town attorney to defend the selectmen’s goal and pay another attorney to defend the budget committee‘s decision.
This will most likely be decided by Budget Committee Rich flip-flop-kiss-Gardner’s-Butt Horton. Stemming from a statement he made at a budget committee meeting about cutting at least 20% from the town budget and at the deliberative the town will put 10% back. This statement in it’s context is against the law and the town attorney will hang his hat on it. So the selectmen win you can thank newly elected Rich Horton with his free hot dogs and a vote for me.
It will be interesting to see how the out come will be in this selectmen's power grab. On one hand you have flip-flop Rich Horton and the other hand you have the intimidator Brian Moser
What we have here is the fact the selectmen want total control, to disallow the town people’s voice in the town government process. These power grabbing SOB’s we have elected to run this town are not going to be told to cut salaries, layoffs , curtail projects, capital improvements or delaying buying equipment by the people (the budget committee) the voters elected to control the spending in this town . All the budget committee wanted was to save home owner their rights and enjoyment of their property.
The selectmen have shown how they can be so arrogant and contempt as to corrupt by stacking town committees and the election process with the people’s selection that will help them achieve their goals under the primmest it is the people's choice or is it disavowing the people voice. When the selectmen and their surrogates squash any attempt to appose them.
The fact the selectmen would stoop so low by corrupting pass election to achieve their goals it seems nothing will stand in their way to achieve this goal of controling the spending totally. It seems to me the voters choice means nothing to these selectmen and they will prove it in court. You voters think you elect people but you really have no choice.
This suit filed will cost the tax payers a chunk of change and it will dwaft Sharra's cost to the town while looking like chump change. We the tax payers will be suing ourselves and the budget committee being an entity of the town will have to be defended by the town.
This attorney the budget committee the tax town payers will have foot the bill on. We will pay the town attorney to defend the selectmen’s goal and pay another attorney to defend the budget committee‘s decision.
This will most likely be decided by Budget Committee Rich flip-flop-Horton. Stemming from a statement he made at a budget committee meeting about cutting at least 20% from the town budget and at the deliberative the town will put 10% back. This statement in it’s context is against the law and the town attorney will hang his hat on it. So the selectmen win you can thank newly elected Rich Horton with his free hot dogs and a vote for me.
Post a Comment